Am I the only one who thinks BH Obama's whining about Rush Limbaugh to be a tad embarrassing? Seriously, this is a president who is trying to lecture people to stop listening to Rush. The hypocrisy is astounding from Obama. He wants to lecture an UNELECTED citizen on what he says, yet won't take on anyone on his side for being polarizing?
That's fine and dandy that Obama wants bi-partisanship..... But, if he wants this, he should be going after BOTH sides. Such as Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid, who are about as hyper-partisan as there is in this country. Liberals think of Rush's partisanship just as conservatives think of these two as partisan. But the difference is......... Pelosi and Reid are elected officials. And still, Obama chooses to lecture the Republican congress not to listen to a partisan as Rush.
The fact is, Obama wants to silence his distractors. Isn't it a bit hypocritical? Especially when liberals demonized Republicans and Bush that had never been seen before, all in the good name of free speech?
Thursday, January 29, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
No Lobbyists allowed, oh really?
Barack Obama’s new lobbying rules are fueling the concerns of senators from both parties regarding the nomination of William Lynn to become deputy defense secretary.Obama signed an executive order Wednesday strengthening the restrictions on lobbyists and former lobbyists entering his administration.
“If you are a lobbyist entering my administration, you will not be able to work on matters you lobbied on, or in the agencies you lobbied, during the previous two years,” Obama said in a press conference.
Lynn lobbied on behalf of defense contractor Raytheon Co. until last year and now stands to be in a position to make decisions on a plethora of the defense giant’s programs as the new manager of the Pentagon.
A bit hypocritical??
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
The Bush Legacy
The game of politics is a rough and tumble one. It is a place for not the faint of heart. It can be described as a thankless positions many times. It must feel like the one in this position has the weight of the world on its shoulders. And many times, the last statement may actually be true.
What got me to write this blog entry was after reading this article regarding George W. Bush. It can be find here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/bush_and_the_bushhaters.html. Everybody who knows me well knows exactly where I stand in my political beliefs. It's not by chance that I come to these conclusions. I arrive at these through thorough thought, reflection, and how each issue pertains to my everyday way of life, core beliefs, faith, etc.
Putting all political issues aside, I think the author did a great job of describing Bush. Whether you like him or hate him, one has to fully admire his deep convictions. When was the last time any man ever been so unfairly lambasted, ridiculed, beaten down, cursed, treated like garbage? And with that, has any one heard Bush giving it back to those who have treated him this way? (FYI- Clinton publicly became irrate, cursed his adversaries. In my opinion this shows a wide gap in maturity between the two.) I haven't. Instead, all you hear from his staff and from reporters is how upbeat he always is, how his faith sustains him. Once again putting personal politics aside, if one can't admire that, maybe they have the problem.
I fully believe history will vindicate George W. Bush in his prosecution on the war on terror, just the way it did for Harry Truman. History will appreciate the fact that Bush kept us safe from attack. History will show the programs and agencies put in place, like Homeland Security, was the right thing to do. History has already shown the Surveillance Act has already thwarted numerous attacks on us and our allies. History will show that Military Tribunals was the right thing to do with caught terrorists.
Finally, I still believe that most liberals believe there isn't an enemy. Or that they are misunderstood. I'm sick and tired of liberals wanting to give terrorists the benefit of the doubt, and not our 43rd President.
What got me to write this blog entry was after reading this article regarding George W. Bush. It can be find here: http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2009/01/bush_and_the_bushhaters.html. Everybody who knows me well knows exactly where I stand in my political beliefs. It's not by chance that I come to these conclusions. I arrive at these through thorough thought, reflection, and how each issue pertains to my everyday way of life, core beliefs, faith, etc.
Putting all political issues aside, I think the author did a great job of describing Bush. Whether you like him or hate him, one has to fully admire his deep convictions. When was the last time any man ever been so unfairly lambasted, ridiculed, beaten down, cursed, treated like garbage? And with that, has any one heard Bush giving it back to those who have treated him this way? (FYI- Clinton publicly became irrate, cursed his adversaries. In my opinion this shows a wide gap in maturity between the two.) I haven't. Instead, all you hear from his staff and from reporters is how upbeat he always is, how his faith sustains him. Once again putting personal politics aside, if one can't admire that, maybe they have the problem.
I fully believe history will vindicate George W. Bush in his prosecution on the war on terror, just the way it did for Harry Truman. History will appreciate the fact that Bush kept us safe from attack. History will show the programs and agencies put in place, like Homeland Security, was the right thing to do. History has already shown the Surveillance Act has already thwarted numerous attacks on us and our allies. History will show that Military Tribunals was the right thing to do with caught terrorists.
Finally, I still believe that most liberals believe there isn't an enemy. Or that they are misunderstood. I'm sick and tired of liberals wanting to give terrorists the benefit of the doubt, and not our 43rd President.
Tuesday, January 13, 2009
Imagine
Let's just take a moment to imagine the unbelievable outcry that would be taking place if a Republican President elect would have made some of these choices for his cabinet:
Take Timothy Geithner, the Treasury Secretary nominee. He did not pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for four straight years. He said it was an honest mistake. Ok, whatever. To seriously say that someone with his background "forgot" to pay taxes for FOUR straight years, you'd need to be quite gullible.
In addition, he counted kids camps as childcare write-offs, which they actually are not. Also, he hired an immigrant that worked for him without legal papers.
The point is, why are the Mainstream Liberal Media so very understanding of this mistake, when they had absolutely no forgiveness to any of President Bush's cabinet appointees? I think we all know the answer. The double standard and hypocrisy is quite astounding.
Now there is Eric Holder, the nominee for Attorney General. He has the baggage of being counsel for Rod Blagojevich a few years ago. Oops!! In addition, he was a part of pardoning one of the FBI's 10 most wanted back in 2000, Marc Rich. What a disgrace!
Now close your eyes and think: If these were Republicans, would they be approved without going through hell??? Didn't think so!
Take Timothy Geithner, the Treasury Secretary nominee. He did not pay Social Security and Medicare taxes for four straight years. He said it was an honest mistake. Ok, whatever. To seriously say that someone with his background "forgot" to pay taxes for FOUR straight years, you'd need to be quite gullible.
In addition, he counted kids camps as childcare write-offs, which they actually are not. Also, he hired an immigrant that worked for him without legal papers.
The point is, why are the Mainstream Liberal Media so very understanding of this mistake, when they had absolutely no forgiveness to any of President Bush's cabinet appointees? I think we all know the answer. The double standard and hypocrisy is quite astounding.
Now there is Eric Holder, the nominee for Attorney General. He has the baggage of being counsel for Rod Blagojevich a few years ago. Oops!! In addition, he was a part of pardoning one of the FBI's 10 most wanted back in 2000, Marc Rich. What a disgrace!
Now close your eyes and think: If these were Republicans, would they be approved without going through hell??? Didn't think so!
Friday, December 19, 2008
Draining the Swamp
After overwhelmingly winning the 2006 elections, Nancy Pelosi promised to "drain the swamps of corruption". After all, corruption was a big reason why Democrats took over the Senate and the House that year. See Mark Foley, Duke Cunningham, Ted Stevens, et al.
Now that they are in power, the corruption scandals seem to be favoring the party in power, the Democrats. However, Pelosi remains disturbingly quiet. What a surprise, when the other side does it, she shouts from the rooftops. When her side does it, all is quiet about her and her parties' self righteousness.
Examples of said Democrat corruption:
Now that they are in power, the corruption scandals seem to be favoring the party in power, the Democrats. However, Pelosi remains disturbingly quiet. What a surprise, when the other side does it, she shouts from the rooftops. When her side does it, all is quiet about her and her parties' self righteousness.
Examples of said Democrat corruption:
- Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich auctioning off Obama's Senate seat to the highest bidder. Darn wiretaps caught him though.
- Charlie Rangel- Not paying taxes on income and speaking engagements, as well as taking Caribbean trips on the Governments dime. Worse though, he heads the powerful House Ways and Means Committee.
- Illinois Rep. Luis Gutierrez, who racked up $420,000 through a series of suspicious real-estate deals.
- Texas Rep. Silvestre Reyes, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, came under scrutiny this fall for questionable earmarking.
- West Virginia Rep. Alan Mollohan has been under investigation for a separate earmarking mess.
- Banking Senate Chair Chris Dodd taking sweetheart loan deals from Countrywide, saving over 80K.
- North Dakota Senator Kent Conrad also taking sweetheart deals from Countrywide.
- Baltimore Mayor Sheila A. Dixon was charged with 12 counts of felony theft, perjury, fraud and misconduct in office, becoming the city's first sitting mayor to be criminally indicted.
- Former Rep. William Jefferson was found with over 90K in cash in his freezer, from bribes and other illegal activity.
- New Mexico Governor Bill Richardson is accused of rewarding a contract company over 1M worth of work for contributing to his campaign. The trial starts soon....
- Los Angeles mayor Antonio Villaragoisa had an affair with a news anchor, while lying about it. He gave the anchor preferential treatment with interviews and finances.
- Former VP Candidate John Edwards had an affair with one of his staffers, while his wife is battling a life-threatening cancer. He lied about it until finally getting caught with pictures. Classy!
Tuesday, December 9, 2008
Chicago Politics and "Change"
It's starting.....
Regarding Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich's indictment:
Barry Obama said today that he didn't speak to the governor about the senate seat being vacated by Obama. However, on November 23rd, Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, said that Blago and Obama have discussed it..... And now today, Axelrod is laying on the grenade, saying that he misspoke, and that indeed, Obama didn't speak with the governor. Do we really believe this?
Remember, Blago and Obama have something big in common, besides being a part of the liberal gutter Chicago politics: They were both under the convicted felon Tony Rezko's umbrella, as Rezko helped start both of their political careers in Chicago.
Regarding Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich's indictment:
Barry Obama said today that he didn't speak to the governor about the senate seat being vacated by Obama. However, on November 23rd, Obama's chief strategist, David Axelrod, said that Blago and Obama have discussed it..... And now today, Axelrod is laying on the grenade, saying that he misspoke, and that indeed, Obama didn't speak with the governor. Do we really believe this?
Remember, Blago and Obama have something big in common, besides being a part of the liberal gutter Chicago politics: They were both under the convicted felon Tony Rezko's umbrella, as Rezko helped start both of their political careers in Chicago.
Friday, December 5, 2008
Dodgers offseason
Well, as we approach the Winter Meetings for baseball, it will be very interesting to see what the Dodgers do. There are plenty of holes, yet plenty of freed up salary to go after some players. I will say that I'm very annoyed by our owner, Jaime McCourt asking the fans if it's more important to sign a high priced free agent pitcher, or build little league fields in the community. She fails to realize these examples are exclusive from one another. Community involvement and fielding a good baseball team should not be a choice of either or. If success results on the field, more $$ and revenue will come off it. And of course Dodger fans want the best player possible. The McCourts are the owners to win, not be charity to the community.
As to what we should do, I've stated in previous posts the need to keep Furcal. Unfortunately, Furcal and his agent are wanting a four year deal. Being that he has only had one injury free season as a Dodger, they are not willing to give Furcal that kind of contract. However, the Oakland A's are the front runners, and appear like the ones that will match Furcal's contract desires. It's a shame, but part of the business.
The good news regarding Manny Ramirez- Even though the Dodgers have taken their initial offer of 2 years/45 Mil. off the table, we've offered him salary arbitration. If he accepts, he should make as much, if not more than A-Rod. Even though it would only be for one year, it would make him the highest paid player for a single season in the history of the game. A lot of the Dodgers optimism of keeping Ramirez has to do with the lack of interest by other big revenue clubs. The Yankees want Sabathia and more pitching, plus they already have three corner outfielders who make a ton of money. The Mets want starting pitching and a closer. The Phillies don't appear interested. Forget about the Red Sox. The Angels want Teixeira and/or Sabathia. The Giants have said they won't pony up that money for him. Who else is there? The Dodgers still appear to be the hands on favorite to keep Manny, whether it be through the one year arbitration, or if they hammer out a 2-3 year deal with an option.
My dad keeps telling me that the Dodgers might be better off letting Furcal go, letting Berroa take over. This would allow more money to be freed up for other signings. Although I understand the point and it makes sense, I'd still LOVE for Furcal to come back.
Infield takes shape- Casey Blake's agent says the Dodgers and Twins are the favorites to land him. If the Dodgers were to get him, it would possibly allow the infield to be set, given the above scenario with Berroa.
Catcher- The need to get a decent backup to Russell Martin is important. Martin is so valuable, that we cannot wear him down toward the end of every season. For that reason, we need to get a capable backup, such as a Javier Valentin, who is available. Since Martin is capable at 3B, he can give Blake a blow once in a while as well, allowing Valentin to catch 30-40 games. This would help Martin immensely.
Starting Pitching- Do we sign a middle rotation guy? If so, our pecking order would be Billingsley, Kuroda, new guy, Kershaw, McDonald. This doesn't look strong enough for me. However, it would be good enough to compete for the NL title. But is that all we want? If we can get a guy like Sabathia, that would turn everything on its head. We'd immediately become the favorite in the division. And if Manny accepted arbitration, we'd have a huge payroll next year, but then Schmidt and Jones contracts would be gone.
Outfield- Ethier and Matt Kemp are definite starters. If Manny comes back, there's our outfield, with Pierre being the fourth outfielder. Ethier, Kemp, and Pierre is simply not a good enough outfield, especially if Furcal doesn't come back. But the question looms, who bats leadoff?
Here's my best guess on who the everyday lineup will be, on the eve of the Winter Meetings, where a lot can happen.
CF- Matt Kemp
2B- Blake DeWitt
LF- Manny Ramirez
RF- Andre Ethier
1B- James Loney
C- Russell Martin
3B- Casey Blake
SS- Angel Berroa
P- Chad Billingsley
P- Hiroki Kuroda
P- Clayton Kershaw
P- James McDonald
P- FA pitcher to be named
As to what we should do, I've stated in previous posts the need to keep Furcal. Unfortunately, Furcal and his agent are wanting a four year deal. Being that he has only had one injury free season as a Dodger, they are not willing to give Furcal that kind of contract. However, the Oakland A's are the front runners, and appear like the ones that will match Furcal's contract desires. It's a shame, but part of the business.
The good news regarding Manny Ramirez- Even though the Dodgers have taken their initial offer of 2 years/45 Mil. off the table, we've offered him salary arbitration. If he accepts, he should make as much, if not more than A-Rod. Even though it would only be for one year, it would make him the highest paid player for a single season in the history of the game. A lot of the Dodgers optimism of keeping Ramirez has to do with the lack of interest by other big revenue clubs. The Yankees want Sabathia and more pitching, plus they already have three corner outfielders who make a ton of money. The Mets want starting pitching and a closer. The Phillies don't appear interested. Forget about the Red Sox. The Angels want Teixeira and/or Sabathia. The Giants have said they won't pony up that money for him. Who else is there? The Dodgers still appear to be the hands on favorite to keep Manny, whether it be through the one year arbitration, or if they hammer out a 2-3 year deal with an option.
My dad keeps telling me that the Dodgers might be better off letting Furcal go, letting Berroa take over. This would allow more money to be freed up for other signings. Although I understand the point and it makes sense, I'd still LOVE for Furcal to come back.
Infield takes shape- Casey Blake's agent says the Dodgers and Twins are the favorites to land him. If the Dodgers were to get him, it would possibly allow the infield to be set, given the above scenario with Berroa.
Catcher- The need to get a decent backup to Russell Martin is important. Martin is so valuable, that we cannot wear him down toward the end of every season. For that reason, we need to get a capable backup, such as a Javier Valentin, who is available. Since Martin is capable at 3B, he can give Blake a blow once in a while as well, allowing Valentin to catch 30-40 games. This would help Martin immensely.
Starting Pitching- Do we sign a middle rotation guy? If so, our pecking order would be Billingsley, Kuroda, new guy, Kershaw, McDonald. This doesn't look strong enough for me. However, it would be good enough to compete for the NL title. But is that all we want? If we can get a guy like Sabathia, that would turn everything on its head. We'd immediately become the favorite in the division. And if Manny accepted arbitration, we'd have a huge payroll next year, but then Schmidt and Jones contracts would be gone.
Outfield- Ethier and Matt Kemp are definite starters. If Manny comes back, there's our outfield, with Pierre being the fourth outfielder. Ethier, Kemp, and Pierre is simply not a good enough outfield, especially if Furcal doesn't come back. But the question looms, who bats leadoff?
Here's my best guess on who the everyday lineup will be, on the eve of the Winter Meetings, where a lot can happen.
CF- Matt Kemp
2B- Blake DeWitt
LF- Manny Ramirez
RF- Andre Ethier
1B- James Loney
C- Russell Martin
3B- Casey Blake
SS- Angel Berroa
P- Chad Billingsley
P- Hiroki Kuroda
P- Clayton Kershaw
P- James McDonald
P- FA pitcher to be named
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)