Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Apologizing to China for Arizona immigration
This is truly a head scratcher.... We know that Obama has the penchant for apologizing for America overseas over the past few years. Now some in his State Department are doing the same. Michael Posner, State Department Official, had a visit with the higher ups from China. One of the first things Posner inquired about was China's opinion on the Arizona Immigration Law, and that he disagreed with this state policy. Of all people, we are now going to China for insight and opinions??? This is one of the worst country's to speak on human rights issues; hello Tibet!!! For Posner to bring up an American law to a foreign nation is absolutely breathtaking.
Blumenthal lies about Vietnam
At the start of 2010, Republicans were in the driver's seat to take Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd's seat. After reading the tea leaves, Dodd decided to not seek re-election. In this heavily Democrat state, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal put his hat into the ring. Immediately Blumenthal was winning in the polls by 20-30 points over any Republican challenger. You would have thought that Blumenthal's chances were next to 100 percent. The is unless, of course, one decides to lie about their military service. IN a stunning revelation, Blumenthal was "caught" by the New York Times of all sources, that he did NOT serve in Vietnam as Blumenthal has said on several occasions on the campaign trail. Oops!!! Blumenthal's response to this is that he "misspoke". This is just like saying Bill Clinton accidentally put his penis in Monica Lewinsky's mouth on several occasions.
Monday, May 17, 2010
Arizona Immigration Law
I think many people who disapprove of the new enforcing of the Federal law really get caught up in the emotion of the debate. I think the vast majority of society want immigrants to come to our wonderful country. However, not illegally! What this law does is actually enforce the federal law. If you don't believe me, read both laws. As far as the profiling, the cops can only ask for their papers of citizenship if they are already in contact with them because of illegal activity. So this severely reduces the chances for profiling.
The real blame should go to the federal government. This includes the Bush Administration and the Obama Administration. Neither have spent much time focusing on eliminating the chance for illegals to get into our country.
As it stands now, over 55 percent of the country want their state to enforce this law the way Arizona has. In addition, the Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has seen a huge spike in her approval ratings.
Let's take the emotion out of the debate and start trying to fix the problem. Those who disagree with this law need to stop calling those who favor it bigots. It's getting old, this rhetoric!
The real blame should go to the federal government. This includes the Bush Administration and the Obama Administration. Neither have spent much time focusing on eliminating the chance for illegals to get into our country.
As it stands now, over 55 percent of the country want their state to enforce this law the way Arizona has. In addition, the Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has seen a huge spike in her approval ratings.
Let's take the emotion out of the debate and start trying to fix the problem. Those who disagree with this law need to stop calling those who favor it bigots. It's getting old, this rhetoric!
Repeal it!
According to Rasmussen Reports, 56 percent want Obamacare repealed. Amazing that this number is so high. This goes beyond those who disagree with it...it's to the point that not only do they disagree with it, but want further action (repeal). Truly amazing. Nonetheless, the Democrats are completely tone-deaf.
The day of reckoning will be upon these liberals-- November 3rd, 2010!!
The day of reckoning will be upon these liberals-- November 3rd, 2010!!
Thursday, April 8, 2010
US not to use Nuclear Weapons
The Obama Administration has decided it is best to let the world know that we will not use a Nuclear Weapon in response to an attack from a country that does not use them themselves. In other words, if any rogue country (besides N. Korea and Iran) attacked us with a Biological or Chemical weapon, we have promised NOT to use a Nuclear weapon in return. So what are we going to use? This seems to box the United States in. To say that the world "appreciates" this gesture is not a valid reason in announcing this action. And there were obvious signs that the Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates, had deep reservations about this policy Obama is taking on. But as any liberal President would say-- As long as it makes the New York Times happy....... Ugh!
Looking at history- What if we told the world that we wouldn't use a Nuclear weapon before WWII? Our response to Pearl Harbor would not have done the everlasting damage it against our enemy. Also, before the Gulf War in 1991, Defense Secretary George Shultz told a high ranking Iraqi official that if they used Biological or Chemical weapons on the US, we would hold the Nuclear option on the table. Many experts believe this help deterred Iraq from using these weapons against us. There's nothing like the threat of something that holds our enemy back. Apparently, Obama doesn't believe this. I'd imagine the majority of the country would disagree with him.
Looking at history- What if we told the world that we wouldn't use a Nuclear weapon before WWII? Our response to Pearl Harbor would not have done the everlasting damage it against our enemy. Also, before the Gulf War in 1991, Defense Secretary George Shultz told a high ranking Iraqi official that if they used Biological or Chemical weapons on the US, we would hold the Nuclear option on the table. Many experts believe this help deterred Iraq from using these weapons against us. There's nothing like the threat of something that holds our enemy back. Apparently, Obama doesn't believe this. I'd imagine the majority of the country would disagree with him.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Media Bias
To basically all accounts, the media has a strong bias to the left. In the 08 Presidential election, it was notated that over 85% of the media supported Obama's candidacy. Because we are all human beings, our biases can't help but seep into the news articles or TV news. That's just a matter of fact. In a one month segment during the 08 campaign, positive TV coverage on Obama was around 80%, while McCain's positive press was around 35%. Do people really just think McCain was a bad guy, or didn't offer any great solutions? Or was Obama was great, he didn't deserve any media scrutiny? With the bombastic stories during the campaign of Jeremiah Wright, the association with terrorist Bill Ayers and felon Tony Rezko, along with his comments about distributing the wealth, his stand on allowing extreme uses of abortion-- it would seem like more scrutiny would head Obama's way.
One of the reasons so many on the political left throw bombs at Fox News is because they are the one source that doesn't tilt left. Do they tilt right? I would say yes. Nonetheless, when you compare Fox News against CBS News (Couric), NBC News (Williams), ABC News (Gibson), the three network news channels are extremely liberal, and have an obvious bias. In addition, if conservatives want to go to Fox News to get their "bias" news, liberals can go to MSNBC to get their liberal "bias". And when you compare Fox and MSNBC, MSNBC is far more tilted to the left, than Fox is to the right. Sure, each side has bias opinion journalists. But when a network (MSNBC) uses their opinion guys as the ones who head the news coverage, that spells trouble. In the 08 election, committed lefties Olbermann and Matthews were giving the "news" during the party conventions. And Fox News had straight down the center on his reporting Brit Hume, along with Chris Wallace. Pretty big distinction there. Beyond the TV media, the print media tilts pretty strongly to the left. You can name the largest 30 newspapers in the country, and I bet I can name on one hand the ones that have editorials that slant to the right-- Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, Las Vegas Sun Review. This, while about every other paper tilts strongly to the left.
A few more media biases to consider. Although the majority of the country believe strongly in the right to bear arms, most papers and TV stations rail on the 2nd Amendment in every related court case. Just like the 2nd Amendment, the country is now more pro-life than pro-choice. Even so, the media will roast anyone who believes in the sanctity of life. They get portrayed as illiterate, not knowing the scientific issues, etc. Same goes for the Tea Party. Even though in a recent poll, 40% were either Independent or Democrat, these journalists act as if they are all red-neck conservatives who have never seen a big city. If you don't believe this analysis, just read the New York Times over the past 2 weeks. The fact is, the majority of the Tea Party movement make over 55K a year. Hardly the caricature the mainstream media is portraying them to be.
With all of this, a Rasmussen Poll just released stated that 55% believe the media bias is of more concern than the just finished Supreme Court Case revolved around campaign givings by corporations. Pretty startling numbers.
One of the reasons so many on the political left throw bombs at Fox News is because they are the one source that doesn't tilt left. Do they tilt right? I would say yes. Nonetheless, when you compare Fox News against CBS News (Couric), NBC News (Williams), ABC News (Gibson), the three network news channels are extremely liberal, and have an obvious bias. In addition, if conservatives want to go to Fox News to get their "bias" news, liberals can go to MSNBC to get their liberal "bias". And when you compare Fox and MSNBC, MSNBC is far more tilted to the left, than Fox is to the right. Sure, each side has bias opinion journalists. But when a network (MSNBC) uses their opinion guys as the ones who head the news coverage, that spells trouble. In the 08 election, committed lefties Olbermann and Matthews were giving the "news" during the party conventions. And Fox News had straight down the center on his reporting Brit Hume, along with Chris Wallace. Pretty big distinction there. Beyond the TV media, the print media tilts pretty strongly to the left. You can name the largest 30 newspapers in the country, and I bet I can name on one hand the ones that have editorials that slant to the right-- Wall Street Journal, Washington Times, Las Vegas Sun Review. This, while about every other paper tilts strongly to the left.
A few more media biases to consider. Although the majority of the country believe strongly in the right to bear arms, most papers and TV stations rail on the 2nd Amendment in every related court case. Just like the 2nd Amendment, the country is now more pro-life than pro-choice. Even so, the media will roast anyone who believes in the sanctity of life. They get portrayed as illiterate, not knowing the scientific issues, etc. Same goes for the Tea Party. Even though in a recent poll, 40% were either Independent or Democrat, these journalists act as if they are all red-neck conservatives who have never seen a big city. If you don't believe this analysis, just read the New York Times over the past 2 weeks. The fact is, the majority of the Tea Party movement make over 55K a year. Hardly the caricature the mainstream media is portraying them to be.
With all of this, a Rasmussen Poll just released stated that 55% believe the media bias is of more concern than the just finished Supreme Court Case revolved around campaign givings by corporations. Pretty startling numbers.
Thursday, April 1, 2010
This weeks politics
As the media and the country continue to debate the new Health Care Reform signed into law by Obama, this only hurts the Democrats and boosts Republicans. Take the following set of polls as proof:
Obama agreed to open up portions of the Atlantic for oil drilling. This pissed the Mother Jones wing of his party off. However, he refused to allow opening of drilling on the Pacific, as well as Alaska (ANWR) where the oil is abundant. This pisses the conservatives off. He's really digging himself a hole. A hole that if it gets too deep, will start making him look like a Jimmy Carter, one term President... and a bad one at that.
- Republicans lead Democrats in all Congressional generic polls. Average around 3-4 points.
- Enthusiasm for 2010 elections is 50% very excited for Republicans; 35% very excited for Democrats. Intensity is the name of the game in midterm elections.
- 50-40 average. People against Obamacare. This is an average of all polls.
- 44-34 percent believe this bill will harm our economy, according to Gallup.
- 55-29 believe quality of care will go down, according to Gallup.
- 61-23 believe the US debt will go up from Obamacare.
Obama agreed to open up portions of the Atlantic for oil drilling. This pissed the Mother Jones wing of his party off. However, he refused to allow opening of drilling on the Pacific, as well as Alaska (ANWR) where the oil is abundant. This pisses the conservatives off. He's really digging himself a hole. A hole that if it gets too deep, will start making him look like a Jimmy Carter, one term President... and a bad one at that.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)