Defund NPR

Why does NPR get a pass from the liberal media for not being "straight down the middle reporting"? Well, because the liberal media doesn't think they are liberal, so why would they think NPR is? Last week, liberal commentator Juan Williams was fired from NPR for giving a personal feeling that he feels uncomfortable at airports when he sees a muslim dressed in "muslim garb". Williams wasn't giving an opinion, he was portraying a personal feeling. Truth be told- who in our country wouldn't think this? I surely do!

Anyway, NPR fired him for expressing his opinion on Fox News, and that he's not allowed to do this. Even though often shows a liberal perspective, he was fired. It's more than obvious that he was fired for being a regular contributor to Fox News. If it were for offering an opinion, as the NPR CEO said, why do the other commentators get fired for offering theirs? Here's an example of two NPR employees who gave their opinion on things:

• Cokie Roberts saying that pro-lifers who are against partial birth abortion are basically nuts.
• Nina Totenburg saying former conservative senator Jesse Helms deserves aids for his beliefs, or at least his grandkids deserve aids. WOW!!!!
  

And these two correspondents still have jobs at NPR. And there's no evidence to show they were even repremended for these comments. Could it be because they were extreme liberal perspectives? I wonder!!

The fact is, Fox News dominates the ratings, and liberals don't like it. They don't like it because Fox shows BOTH sides to the argument. And the reason why liberals think it's a conservative network is because they aren't used to seeing a news outlet not being completely in the tank for liberal politicians or causes--- see Katie Couric, Brian Williams, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw, Peter Jennings, etc etc etc..

And good for Williams. He's now a multi-millionaire as a contributor for Fox. Take that NPR. And why again do our taxes go for funding an outlet like NPR? Don't we have enough options that are free, as in tax-free?

Foreign Donations in politics

What's with all the hoopla over foreign donations? Is it true that every time we turn on the TV, we are flooded with ads denouncing a certain candidate? Yes. Is it very annoying at times? You bet! However, as the Obama Administration tries to define this as the Republicans spending hundreds of millions to defeat Democrats, let's take a look at a few of the facts, why don't we:

• Obama promised to take federal funding if his opponent did in '08. After McCain decided to take federal funding, Obama decided to opt out and take personal money, therefore unlimited. So not only does Obama go back on a promise, but he does EXACTLY what he's complaining the GOP is doing in '10.
• Of the top 10 spending organizations, 6 of them are liberally funded. And the tops is the ACSME municipal union.
  
• Obama accepted over $400 million in donations that didn't have a name attached to it, so he can't say one side is playing hardball with donations, but he isn't. Once again, he did EXACTLY what he's complaining about now.
• In fact, in 2008, liberals spent over a hundred million dollars more than conservatives on political races.
• Argument liberals make- The unions have a name behind them and some of these donations don't. Well, that doesn't hold water, as many of these union members who pay monthly dues, don't even support these ads. It's the brass that decides to spend the money on this.
• Chamber of Commerce, Karl Rove- These were the bogeymen of the Obama argument of receiving foreign donations. However, there is ZERO evidence any foreign donations have seeped into advertising for or against a candidate. Wasn't Obama supposed to be about hope and change, and not fear? Oops!!!
• If Obama didn't like the law of not having more transparency, he should have done two things: #1- Don't receive funds for his campaign that didn't have names attached to them. And #2, change the law. Remember, he had the Presidency and both houses of congress. Where's his excuse?? Sounds like fear-mongering to the far left political base.. the base in which Obama stands.
  

When in doubt, Democrats blast pro-lifers

This is exactly why I, as a Christian, would NEVER vote for a Democrat!!! My morals say that the political issue of life is the most important. With that being said, any pro-life Democrat is simply disagreeing with their party's leadership that will always get their way. In other words, the party platform will support the most pro-choice policies possible.. (ie- Mexico City policy, partial birth abortion, parent notification, etc.).

Barbara Boxer is saying that opponent Carly Fiorina is a pro-life zealot. So because Fiorina believes in life, Boxer has to scare the electorate about Fiorina's beliefs. This is absolutely disgusting by Boxer. And since Michele and Barack have campaigned for Boxer, apparently they endorse this type of advertising.

With that being said... How can ANY pro-life Christian support Democrats in our country????

Change won't happen under Obama says his supporters

"Hope and Change" were the main themes for Obama's rallying cry in 2008. The ability to work across party lines and get things done in Washington; to restore the civility; to avoid the "pettiness" that divides us; to do the "will" of the people.... blah, blah, blah...

Wouldn't it be nice....

Instead, we all know that with majorities in the House and Senate, Obama hasn't worked with Republicans on anything. He may say it's the GOP's fault, but wasn't he supposed to rise above this? Especially since all of his policies have the majority of all Americans against (Arizona immigration, ground zero mosque, healthcare, cap and trade, stimulus, etc.).

Now, according to the latest Associated Press poll, 63 percent of Obama backers in 2008 do NOT believe that Obama is employing the change that he promised. If 63 percent of his supporters think this, imagine how many McCain supporters think Obama has changed things for the better in Washington.

Because of the above, being that we live in a politically center-right nation, this far left President is going to see his party receive a bloodbath in 2 weeks.

25 percent of Democrats want Obamacare repealed

Do I need to say more? This is nothing short of astonishing!! We know that about 9 in 10 Republicans and 7 in 10 Independents want it repealed, but to bleed Democrats at a 1 in 4 clip has to be putting Obama in fetal position about now. This is according to a The Hill/ANGA poll.

Say goodbye to the House!

Senate has a good chance as well!!

Will the White House be gone too in 2012???