White House wants to buy off congressman

In an attempt to keep congressman Joe Sestak from running against White House preferred candidate Arlen Specter for Pennsylvania Senate, Sestak maintains the White House Admin. bribed Sestak with a administration position if he backed out from running. Of course, Sestak eventually beat Specter. But the question remains, did the White House bribe Sestak, which is a felony? Every time the press has asked an admin official, they have NOT answered the question, thus not denying it.

Once again I have to ask Mr. President, is this the change we were supposed to believe in???

Rand Paul begs Obama to campaign for his opponent

Rand Paul, winner of the Republican Primary in Kentucky, is pleading with President Obama to campaign for Paul's Democrat opponent. Classic!! Nothing like mocking the unpopular President...and incredibly unpopular in states like Kentucky.

So Obama has publicly backed strongly four candidates since becoming President. Here they are and the results:

• Creigh Deeds for Governor of Virginia. Deeds was smashed by Bob McDonnell by 18 points in 2009 race. Obama campaigned for Deeds on more than one occasion.
  
• Jon Corzine for Governor of New Jersey. Corzine lost to Chris Christie by 5 points, despite being a liberal state. Obama and Corzine were closely aligned.
• Martha Coakley for Senator of Massachusetts. In the most liberal of liberal states, Republican Scott Brown (with help from the Tea Party) beat Coakley by about 5 points. Obama campaigned with Coakley the week of the contest. Insult to injury for Obama- Brown promised to be the vote trying to block Obama's health care plan.
• Arlen Specter for Senate in Pennsylvania. Specter lost his primary battle to Democrat Joe Sestak. Specter switched his allegiance to the Dems back in 2009 so Obama could get his unpopular programs through.

So needless to say, Obama hasn't had any luck trying to sway the public into voting for his preferred candidates. Let's just hope this trend continues from November 2010, til his re-election in 2012!!

Eric Holder hasn't ready Arizona Immigration Bill

Attorney General Eric Holder has NOT read the Arizona Immigration bill. Nonetheless, Holder is thinking about suing Arizona for their law that Governor Brewer signed. If Holder would actually read the bill and quit kowtowing to the ACLU and liberal wackos, he would come to find that the bill is similar, if not identical to the federal law on illegal immigration. Holder is nothing short of a disgrace!

Apologizing to China for Arizona immigration

This is truly a head scratcher.... We know that Obama has the penchant for apologizing for America overseas over the past few years. Now some in his State Department are doing the same. Michael Posner, State Department Official, had a visit with the higher ups from China. One of the first things Posner inquired about was China's opinion on the Arizona Immigration Law, and that he disagreed with this state policy. Of all people, we are now going to China for insight and opinions??? This is one of the worst country's to speak on human rights issues; hello Tibet!!! For Posner to bring up an American law to a foreign nation is absolutely breathtaking.

Blumenthal lies about Vietnam

At the start of 2010, Republicans were in the driver's seat to take Connecticut Senator Chris Dodd's seat. After reading the tea leaves, Dodd decided to not seek re-election. In this heavily Democrat state, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal put his hat into the ring. Immediately Blumenthal was winning in the polls by 20-30 points over any Republican challenger. You would have thought that Blumenthal's chances were next to 100 percent. The is unless, of course, one decides to lie about their military service. IN a stunning revelation, Blumenthal was "caught" by the New York Times of all sources, that he did NOT serve in Vietnam as Blumenthal has said on several occasions on the campaign trail. Oops!!! Blumenthal's response to this is that he "misspoke". This is just like saying Bill Clinton accidentally put his penis in Monica Lewinsky's mouth on several occasions.

Arizona Immigration Law

I think many people who disapprove of the new enforcing of the Federal law really get caught up in the emotion of the debate. I think the vast majority of society want immigrants to come to our wonderful country. However, not illegally! What this law does is actually enforce the federal law. If you don't believe me, read both laws. As far as the profiling, the cops can only ask for their papers of citizenship if they are already in contact with them because of illegal activity. So this severely reduces the chances for profiling.

The real blame should go to the federal government. This includes the Bush Administration and the Obama Administration. Neither have spent much time focusing on eliminating the chance for illegals to get into our country.

As it stands now, over 55 percent of the country want their state to enforce this law the way Arizona has. In addition, the Arizona Governor Jan Brewer has seen a huge spike in her approval ratings.

Let's take the emotion out of the debate and start trying to fix the problem. Those who disagree with this law need to stop calling those who favor it bigots. It's getting old, this rhetoric!

Repeal it!

According to Rasmussen Reports, 56 percent want Obamacare repealed. Amazing that this number is so high. This goes beyond those who disagree with it...it's to the point that not only do they disagree with it, but want further action (repeal). Truly amazing. Nonetheless, the Democrats are completely tone-deaf.

The day of reckoning will be upon these liberals-- November 3rd, 2010!!